Buy on Amazon
€65.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400 is 509 days older than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Celeron G550 - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - $35.83 vs $58.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-2400 - $0.16 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
OptiPlex Desktop Computer - Intel Core i5 i5-2400 3.10 GHz - Mini-tower
Buy for €65.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
250
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.