Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2400 is 694 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $25.56 vs $27.05
- Up to 9% better value when playing War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - $0.21 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 55 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13732 minutes ago
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |