Buy on Amazon
€28.37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2657 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $25.56 vs $153.55
- Up to 82% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.25 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2400 - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
112
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18771 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
17%
Price, €
€170.44
16%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18772 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.