Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4068 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 59% better in New World than FX-4130 - 154 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $38.04 vs $143.31
- Up to 58% better value when playing New World than Core i5-14600KF - $0.44 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
41.50943396226415%
Price, €
€159.07
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €159.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
97
62.98701298701299%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600KF | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |