Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2675 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 210 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $59.8 vs $457.71
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14600K - $0.39 vs $2.42 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.42/FPS
16%
Price, €
€508.06
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €508.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
169
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |