Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 39% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3240T - 287 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $18.79 vs $172.27
- Up to 85% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-14600K - $0.1 vs $0.67 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
14.925373134328357%
Price, €
€191.22
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €191.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
207
72.12543554006969%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
15.930149679258731%
Multi-Core
971
6.035929632622614%
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |