Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 3900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 3900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 9 3900X - 165 vs 154 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $288.82 vs $457.71
- Up to 32% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-14600K - $2.08 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14600K - 24 vs 20 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
67%
Price, €
€508.06
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €508.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
154
93%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€320.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |