Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4236 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Pentium G640 - 192 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $21.94 vs $146.23
- Up to 84% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-14400F - $0.14 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
16%
Price, €
€162.31
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |