Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-6100 - 194 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $62.15 vs $146.23
- Up to 55% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-14400F - $0.38 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
45%
Price, €
€162.32
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €162.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
180
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |