Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-12100F - 318 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $62.14 vs $146.23
- Up to 57% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-14400F - $0.22 vs $0.51 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
318
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
43%
Price, €
€162.31
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
314
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |