Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 41% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G4900 - 244 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $39.15 vs $128.55
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-14400F - $0.23 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
43.39622641509434%
Price, €
€142.69
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €142.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
173
70.90163934426229%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
26.21276595744681%
Multi-Core
1051
9.252575050620655%
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |