Buy on Amazon
€146.49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 16% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G3930 - 529 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $46.74 vs $131.97
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i5-14400F Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for €146.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76959 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
25.872340425531913%
Multi-Core
1043
9.182146315696805%
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.