Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 2758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 834 vs 678 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $33.59 vs $153.89
- Up to 75% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-14400 - $0.05 vs $0.2 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €170.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
678
81.29496402877699%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
48.06517311608962%
Multi-Core
5480
44.458867434690895%
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |