Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than FX-4300 - 133 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $35.11 vs $158.12
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €175.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75486 minutes ago
Buy for €38.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |