Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Core i5-9400F - 81 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $70.2 vs $177.07
- Up to 45% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13600KF - $1.34 vs $2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
81
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
55%
Price, €
€196.55
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €196.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15297 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
58
71%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |