Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 57% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i5-7400T - 206 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $54.84 vs $171.81
- Up to 51% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.46 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
49%
Price, €
€190.71
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |