Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-2400 - 280 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $58.99 vs $182.78
- Up to 64% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-13600KF - $0.26 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
36%
Price, €
€202.89
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
251
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€65.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €65.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |