Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13400 - 260 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $147.22 vs $174.73
- Up to 15% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.64 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
85.33333333333334%
Price, €
€193.95
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €193.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
97.6923076923077%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €163.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2287
83.25445941026575%
Multi-Core
10364
67.23321440155694%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |