Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-6100 - 247 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $73.12 vs $171.82
- Up to 52% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-13600KF - $0.37 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
48%
Price, €
€190.72
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
222
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |