Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1178 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 3400G - 285 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $73.84 vs $168.74
- Up to 45% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-13600KF - $0.36 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
54.54545454545454%
Price, €
€187.3
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €187.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58227 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
80.35087719298247%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
41.062977793957046%
Multi-Core
3619
23.477132662990595%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |