Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 2600 - 227 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $62.7 vs $177.07
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-13600KF - $0.35 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
40%
Price, €
€196.55
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €196.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16828 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |