Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-7350K - 245 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $37.73 vs $207.66
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-13600K - $0.23 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 60 vs 125 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
24%
Price, €
€230.5
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €230.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
183
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |