Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Deathloop than Core i3-10105 - 197 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $63.19 vs $182.79
- Up to 62% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-13600K - $0.39 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
37.86407766990291%
Price, €
€202.9
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50925 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
90.86294416243655%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1487
55.79737335834897%
Multi-Core
4609
31.041217672413797%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |