Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 254% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930T - 92 vs 26 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $28.52 vs $153.55
- Up to 34% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13600K - $1.22 vs $1.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
65.94594594594594%
Price, €
€170.44
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
26
28.26086956521739%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
20.56285178236398%
Multi-Core
948
6.384698275862069%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |