Buy on Amazon
€197.59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $242
Availability
MSRP in USD: $242
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8370 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $132.34 vs $178.01
- Up to 24% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-13500 - $0.78 vs $1.02 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
76.47058823529413%
Price, €
€197.59
74%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz
Buy for €197.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
189
97.92746113989638%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.9
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy for €146.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13500 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.