Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-960 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4824 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-960.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 50% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-960 - 672 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-960 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-960
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $96.77 vs $658.06
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - $0.24 vs $1.09 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
22%
Price, €
€730.45
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
448
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |