Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4069 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3960X - 160 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $247.05 vs $658.06
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13400F - $1.88 vs $4.57 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.57/FPS
41%
Price, €
€730.45
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
146
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€274.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €274.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |