Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770K - 206 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $94.74 vs $658.06
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - $0.61 vs $3.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.55/FPS
17%
Price, €
€730.45
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78246 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
173
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |