Buy on Amazon
€649.29
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-7600K - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $54.84 vs $584.95
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop (Intel Core™ i5-13400F, 3600Mhz 16GB RGB Memory, NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 4060, 1TB NVMe M.2) S2QT-B66R-460-LCS
Buy for €649.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-7600K LGA 1151 Desktop Processors (BX80677I57600K)
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1507
65.80786026200873%
Multi-Core
4226
39.32992089343881%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.