Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 39% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-10500 - 280 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $102.37 vs $658.06
- Up to 79% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-13400F - $0.56 vs $2.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.61/FPS
21%
Price, €
€730.45
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |