Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i3-10320 - 238 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $102.36 vs $658.06
- Up to 84% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-13400F - $0.5 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.07/FPS
16%
Price, €
€730.45
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |