Buy on Amazon
€730.45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-6200 - 312 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
312
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€730.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop (Intel Core™ i5-13400F, 3600Mhz 16GB RGB Memory, NVIDIA GeForce® RTX 4060, 1TB NVMe M.2) S2QT-B66R-460-LCS
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
