Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2134 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 1700 - 219 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.75 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $142.59 vs $147.22
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.41
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €163.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3665 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
198
90.41095890410958%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
93.75%
Price, €
€158.27
100%
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Single-Core
1005
43.944031482291216%
Multi-Core
5100
49.2087996912389%
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |