Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2094 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 53% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 488 vs 318 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $87.75 vs $145.5
- Up to 6% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400 - $0.31 vs $0.33 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13164 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
318
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |