Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 18% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6300 - 182 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - $71.68 vs $145.5
- Up to 42% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400 - $0.52 vs $0.89 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8151 minutes ago
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |