Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400 - 152 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $87.61 vs $116.14
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12600KF - $0.69 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
81%
Price, €
€128.91
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €128.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |