Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-12100T - 211 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $65.8 vs $116.14
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12600KF - $0.37 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
60%
Price, €
€128.91
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €128.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2022
FPS
199
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-12100T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |