Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 27% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3930T - 200 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $28.52 vs $116.36
- Up to 69% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-12600KF - $0.2 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
30%
Price, €
€129.16
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €129.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |