Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 344 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $202.5 vs $318.06
- Up to 34% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900F - $0.83 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-12600 - 280 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
272
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€224.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €224.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7219 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
280
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
65%
Price, €
€353.05
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |