Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3319 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 21% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1620 - 383 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €154.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
17.697966248377327%
Multi-Core
723
7.963432096045819%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |