Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $81.88 vs $343.65
- Up to 74% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-13900K - $0.49 vs $1.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i5-12400F - 199 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
186
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €90.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
25%
Price, €
€381.45
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €381.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |