Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 365 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12400F - 147 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $350.97 vs $548.39
- Up to 38% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-12400F - $2.65 vs $4.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €608.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€389.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €389.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |