Buy on Amazon
€90.37
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Remnant II than Core i7-870 - 96 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-870 - $0.94 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-870 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $73.12 vs $81.41
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.37
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-12400F Alder Lake CPU LGA 1700 2.5 GHz 6-Core 65W 18MB Cache Desktop Processor
Buy for €90.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1614 minutes ago
Core i7-870
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
79
82.29166666666666%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
91.26213592233009%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Intel Core i7-870 Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1604 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i7-870
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-870
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
482
21.999087174806025%
Multi-Core
1575
17.67676767676768%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.