Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4765T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3138 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-4765T - 285 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $364.82 vs $658.06
- Up to 34% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-12400F - $1.69 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
66%
Price, €
€730.45
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
239
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€404.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |