Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 771 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 474 vs 396 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $81.88 vs $1137.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €90.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76944 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
396
83.54430379746836%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1262.07
7%
Buy for €1,262.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
74.66910086718393%
Multi-Core
14008
100%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |