Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 63% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 270 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $81.88 vs $182.8
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €90.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74389 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
61.48148148148148%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€202.91
44%
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
53.582838886353265%
Multi-Core
6976
78.29405162738496%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |