Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $106.73 vs $357.96
- Up to 67% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-13900F - $0.15 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Core i5-12400 - 866 vs 799 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
799
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €118.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
866
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
33%
Price, €
€397.34
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €397.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |