Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 23% better in Remnant II than FX-8120 - 96 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $57.05 vs $106.73
- Up to 34% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-12400 - $0.81 vs $1.23 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €118.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |