Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2085 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-6700 - 260 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $94.32 vs $121.27
- Up to 13% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-11600KF - $0.45 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
86%
Price, €
€134.61
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €134.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2720 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
232
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |