Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3586 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-2405S - 286 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $33.63 vs $120.57
- Up to 64% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-11600KF - $0.17 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
36%
Price, €
€133.83
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €133.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
226
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |